Category

Philosophy and Culture

“The Best Things in Life” by Peter Kreeft

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

Here is a little gem of a book that I happened to discover in the library of the Catholic apostolate I work at.  It’s called “The Best Things in Life” and it is another of Kreeft’s characterizations of Socrates trying to make head or tails of our modern day.

In the form the original dialogues, the book is comprised of conversation between Socrates and students at “Desperate State” university – how many of us could have applied that title to our own forum of learning?

It takes a chapter or two to get in the rhythm of reading the fast paced dialogue, however one is rewarded by an engaging, witty, socratic challenge to the ideologies and sensibilities of the day. Never telling or preaching, always merely asking and pointing out, Kreeft portrays a convincing and delightful and captivating Socrates – if only he could “corrupt” the minds of today’s youth like he was accused of in Greece?

I would recommend this book both as a quick and delightful refreshment to seasoned thinkers as well as a powerful but engaging challenge to any muddled modernist mind.

10/13/10 – Daily Dose of Catholicism and Culture

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

I work at the Coming Home Network International as a webmaster. The CHNI is a fellowship of Catholic clergy converts and those non-catholic clergy and laity who are interested in making the journey home.

The office has been abuzz as we prepare for our annual “Deep In History” conference in Columbus Ohio. For information visit http://www.chnetwork.org/DIH/deepinhistory.html

My wife and I are visiting Dayton Ohio this thursday. I am giving a talk on “Faith and Reason” to the Theology On Tap, as per the invitation of my good friend DJ Swearingen.

I will be writing (and maybe sharing video!) about faith more in the future, but for now I ask you, what is faith? I, like you, have heard my fair share of definitions, but I, perhaps also like you, have not been satisfied with either the vague and convoluted (and under-explained) definitions I have heard.

The word “faith” is bandied about so much, but what does faith really mean?

>Does it mean, as our atheist friends assume, that we simply perform the mental act of “belief” without any reason, proof, adequate knowledge, or the like?

> Does it mean, as my freshman philosophy classmates concluded, that faith is adhering to the conclusion that seems to have the most evidence? Or to the one that has the highest potential beneficial yield? (the effect of reading Pascal’s wager out of the context of the rest of Pensees)

Are these all that faith is? Or is there something more?

The “Catechism of the Catholic Church” defines faith as “ Man’s response to God”.

While simple, I think this definition is both profound and powerful.

It seems to imply that God takes the first step. It seems to imply that man cannot put faith in God except in response to Him. It seems to imply that one puts faith in God in the context of one’s relationship with God.

You see, if you take a bird’s-eye view at Catholicism, the type of relationship with God it seems to be built to encourage is one of profound closeness and unity. The seven sacraments are visible signs of the spiritual reality of God’s work – they make present to us the ministry of Jesus Christ. We eat His body, we hear Him forgive our sins in confession, we hear God’s word proclaimed at every mass. We are called by the saints into profound contemplation and have examples of the great holy men and women who entered fully into union with God.

Deep down inside I think we all want this type of close relationship with God. However, we don’t pursue it and often avoid even admitting to ourselves we want this relationship because it involves, as I mentioned in my previous post, facing our fears about God (see “Two fears”)

As I said, more to come. This is a pretty big topic for me right now and has been for a while – I appreciate your thoughts and input, especially when I begin posting my more formal reflections.

Thanks for reading!

Great Quote:

“Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried. “ (Gilbert K. Chesterton)

Great Links:

The Bishop and the Conference – Bishop Robert F. Vasa, D.D. A pretty powerful article. One bishop talks candidly and profoundly on the Bishops Conferences and the individual shepherds

Report from the Catholic Undead – Wolfgang Grassl Great article about the state of the Catholic faith in Europe and a comparison/contrast to that of America.

In Persona ET – The Curt Jester Fun article about the possibility of intelligent life on other planets. References to Lewis’ Space Trilogy which I LOVE. Some good fun and intelligent musings from the Curt Jester.

Great Book:

The Screwtape Letters – C.S. Lewis: Only Lewis can pull of books like this. What is your first visceral reaction to the thought of a book that is nothing but the correspondence from an upper level demon to a lower level demon in the field instructing him on the proper temptation of his human charge? As strange as this may sound at first, the book is not only delightful, written with Lewis’ usual charm and wit, but it can be life changing in that it is an exceedingly insightful examination of the inner spiritual battle every human being faces.

10/7/10 Daily Dose of Catholicism & Culture

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

Good evening friends. Beginning this week I will be attempting to add a daily post to this blog that contains a bit of reflection for the day and a compilation of good links, quotes, book/movie/music reviews, and other odds and ends. This daily dose, in the spirit of the blog itself, will follow my walk of faith in a culture of death and will record for posterity the oases I come across in the desert – those little intersections between my catholicism and culture that raise my eyes to heaven, move my heart, get me thinking, or otherwise appear to have value in sharing with you.Read, think, discuss, enjoy!

Notes from the day: Today was my wife’s 26th birthday. After my brief reprieve since my own birthday in August, my wife is now 3 years older than I am once again. : )

Yesterday, we decided to get rid of Netflix. Now don’t get me wrong, we LOVED having Netflix and it definitely provides the most bang for the buck as a source of entertainment. However in the case of Netflix, though we had a steady supply of DVD’s in the mail and on online library streamable any time of the day or night, the problem with such easy entertainment is that it is indeed so easy.

Humans always tend toward the path of least resistance! Both the benefit and problem with movies and video games is that they require minimal effort and provide maximum “entertainment”. When push comes to shove, movies/video games eventually begin to win out over other forms of entertainment, unless conscious action is applied.

Problem for me is that at the end of the day when my wife and I are tired and ready to relax, with an almost unlimited supply of “easy” entertainment, we end up watching the tube far too much.

Now on the flip side of the coin my wife and I really do enjoy watching movies and tv together – we laugh together, discuss the plots and characters, cuddle, etc, and in these respects movies are great!

Our solution? not to eliminate TV/Movies altogether, we are just switching to a different subscription (one from blockbuster) that revolved only around getting movies in the mail. This way, we have movies/tv available to us but at the same time there is a definite cap to how much we can watch.

This is the passive side of the plan. On the active side, we are making sure to pursue other, less “easy” forms of entertainment. I think this is very important. Our appreciation – our ability to appreciate – is like a muscle and needs to be worked. Have you ever noticed that you begin to appreciate things you put time and effort into? Projects, new forms of entertainment, new food or drink, and even people!

There are many forms of entertainment that are “easy” to appreciate because they basically spoonfeed us – movies, video games, net browsing etc. This does not mean they are bad just as candy isn’t “bad”. However, if we eat too much candy (the potential for cavities and weight gain aside) our appreciation for more complex/healthy/beneficial foods will atrophy. In the same way, if we constantly rely on “easy” entertainment not only will our appreciation of greater things become weak, but we also will never grow.

Thus, its good to keep pushing ourselves. We still enjoy watching a good movie here and there but we also do puzzles together (training in patience), we read aloud and vocally act out plays (training in humility and courage), we read books to each other (training in diction), and of course we try to spend more of our time praying together.

If you have any thoughts on movies, entertainment, the ability to appreciate, etc, please respond and discuss!

Great Website:

The Catholic Education Resource Center – For whatever reason, this site never disappoints when it comes to having a consistant supply of very solid and informative Catholic articles. Many sites are a mixed bag one has to sift through, but I am continually please by the variety and quality. Recently read some great articles addressing the “Christopher West Critiques” that have been going around and a fun article about the “manliness” of St. Thomas Aquinas. It is, as its title suggests, a tremendous “resource” for any Catholic reader.

Great Book:

Master Christian author Clive Staples (CS) Lewis offers up a work of pure delight and wonder to fiction lovers. This rollicking sci-fi tale follows Dr. Ransom as he uncovers a living, breathing universe where he thought there was only dead space. It is a universe which not only is populated with extraterrestrials of all shapes and sizes and levels of intelligence, but it is a universe where the physical world is only the “tip of the iceberg” and in which “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” (Shakespeare, Hamlet)

There is great commentary of technology, language, space travel, philosophy, modernism, and a whole host of other themes, all of which are woven beautifully, subtly, and seamlessly into this epic. Like all great books, they gets better every time you read them! I am on my fourth read through and am only picking up on more and more of Lewis’ genius. Definitely a must-read!

Great Quote:

An “impersonal God”– well and good. A subjective God of beauty, truth and goodness, inside our own heads — better still. A formless life-force surging through us, a vast power which we can tap — best of all. But God Himself, alive, pulling at the other end of the cord, perhaps, approaching an infinite speed, the hunter, king, husband — that is quite another matter. There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall? There comes a moment when people who have been dabbling in religion (“Man’s search for God!”) suddenly draw back. Supposing we really found Him? We never meant it to come to that! Worse still, supposing He had found us? –C. S. Lewis

The Insights of Infatuation

By | Marriage & Family, Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | 2 Comments

Its no great revelation that “infatuation doesn’t last”. We know, and yet we all forget when the time comes, that the infatuation stage or mode in a relationship is passing and short-term and should not be the basis of one’s relationship. Even in the stage of infatuation, two lovers must be thinking longer term – asking deeper questions, seeking to learn about one another, seeking to become better lovers.

Now that I am married, while I do have days when I feel infatuated again with my wife, most days I am content with peaceful joy in my marriage rather than the flighty infatuation I once had.

Of course the biggest change that occurs when the infatuation leaves is that whereas before one’s lover seemed to be able to do no wrong and the act of charitably loving them in every situation was almost instinctual rather than willful, now one’s will must often be engaged. The choice of love now loses the feelings of infatuation that made the choice so easy.

Though infatuation itself is simply a state of one’s feelings, mostly brought on by biology, and thus shouldn’t be pursued, relied upon, or expected to last forever, I think we can learn some valuable lessons by reflecting on our hearts in the state of infatuation. Especially on days when we are struggling to love, struggling to be patient, or struggling to fulfill our responsibilities – during these times, reflecting on the state of our previously infatuate hearts can be very insightful, and not necessarily in the ways you might initially think.

Two instances of infatuation come to mind that bear reflection – infatuation as it presented itself in the early days of my relationship with my now-wed wife and infatuation as it is still stirred up sometimes in my heart today.

First, thinking back to the early days of my relationship, It is interesting to recall the state and movements of one’s infatuate heart. Again, the choice to love didn’t even feel like a choice – it was a movement, a passion, and a drive almost. In fact this often gets people into trouble because they forget that love is indeed a choice, and aren’t prepared when the feelings settle.

But it is nevertheless helpful to remember our hearts as they were in infatuation. Not just “how easy it was to love then and how much harder it sometimes is now”, but precisely how did I love? What things did I do? It seems that in the struggle with the choice to love in the present, I may be able to gain insight from the past.

This struck me most poignantly one day when I had found myself frustrated with my mother. After a trying phone call, I had felt the old teenager in me rise in my chest. For a moment I seethed and prayed for patience. But suddenly and inexplicably two thoughts shone clearly in my mind: 1) How I treated my then girlfriend (now wife) and 2) how I treated my mom.

The former I had been decidedly infatuated with, the latter, obviously not. But the comparison hit me nevertheless like a load of bricks. With no small help from infatuation, I was patient with my girlfriend, would listen to her on the phone for hours without growing weary, and would receive every possible irritant with ease. However in the case of my dear mother, I was constantly impatient, could find no time to listen to her, and would instantly become defensive and irritated at the slightest provocation.

However the epiphany did not end there. I saw not just the passive ways I loved and respected my girlfriend for whom I pined, but also the active ways. I always asked how her day was, I constantly inquired as to her feelings, likes and dislikes, and I bought her gifts and left notes as gestures of affection.

But how did I actively love my mother? Certainly one’s infatuated love for one’s girlfriend and the familial love for one’s mother are going to look very different, but nevertheless the comparison shone true. I never asked in any sincerely curious or caring way how my mother was doing. I rarely went out of my way to show her any affection or respect. I realized I knew (or remember) almost nothing about my mothers’ likes, dislikes, past life, or feelings.

As said, the realizations hit home and took root. I began to put these things into practice and love my mother better.

The second instance of infatuation that bears reflection are those days and times when infatuation returns.

All day today I had made small choices – an act of laziness here, letting myself be distracted there, and being selfish in little ways, right and left. Unsurprisingly, later on today when I found myself in a situation that called for patience and charity, my heart was hard and peevish.

As my wife went out to do errands I rallied slightly, saying some prayers, making a to-do list, and shaking myself out of laziness. By the time she returned I had completed my to do list, sought God in prayer and some needed silence, and was feeling in a much better mood all around.

Furthermore, as she walked in with the groceries, I felt a bit of the old fire rekindle in my heart. Conversation came quickly, I found myself feeling concerned and interested, and I was up on nimble toes setting the table for the dinner which I had prepared while she was out.

The summary and conclusion of these two reflections, for me, constitute a personal lesson in the nature of love, emotions, and the relationship between the two.

In the first reflection, recalling the instances where infatuation had made the choice to love my girlfriend practically a non-choice, showed me where I was falling short in loving my mother as I was called to do. However even more practically, the reflection had given me specific suggestions as to how I was to love her.

Sometimes this can be the struggle. Its not just that we are having a hard time choosing to love, but rather in the hardness of our hearts we almost temporarily seem to forget how to love, and all we can think of is how annoyed we are or how tough the situation is (feels). When in this situation, it can be helpful thus to return in reflection to a time and a relationship where infatuation/feelings had made the choices to love quite easy, and then to procure from this reflection specific acts of love and mercy that we can perform in the present.

This first reflection is practical enough and mostly common sensical, but the second reflection shines additional light. In the second reflection we see two instances where actions produce or prompt feelings. Lazy/selfish actions produce an apathetic and selfish heart. Loving/obedient/humble actions produce a heart of charity. It wasn’t until I consciously, willfully performed acts of charity that I began to really feel appreciative of my mom again.

The key here is that while we often look to feelings, emotions, and indeed “infatuation” to be the motor for our actions, while these are sometimes given to us as a grace, WEcan control and are responsible for our actions, regardless of our feelings. Whereas we often wait for and are dismayed when we don’t have “good mood” to be able to “act like a Christian”, we always have the choice to love, even in the worst of moods.

In summary, I have a very obsessive, anxious, inward personality and when I hit a situation in which I am finding it difficult to love, often the “head-game” is what really gets me.

Thus, I offer to you the same advice I give myself: When a time of desolation is making it difficult to love, reflect on the times of consolation. Reflecting on my past infatuation with my girlfriend I can glean specific acts of love that I should put into practice even today, when my feelings aren’t providing much help. Furthermore, reflecting on current instances of infatuation, I recall the oft forgotten common sense that I am always in control and responsible for my actions and that where my will leads, my heart will follow.

Recall the actions of love and reclaim the primacy of your will to accomplish them. Then, take heart and trust that if you choose to love in action you will in turn kindle (or rekindle) the passion.

The proof of love is in the works. Where love exists, it works great things. But when it ceases to act, it ceases to exist. — Pope St. Gregory the Great

We can do no great things; only small things with great love. — Blessed Teresa of Calcutta’

Marriage is an act of will that signifies and involves a mutual gift, which unites the spouses and binds them to their eventual souls, with whom they make up a sole family – a domestic church. – Pope John Paul II

Two Fears – The Reasons We Avoid Discovering Whether God Is Really There

By | Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | 5 Comments

First let me say that I am one who thinks it is healthy and helpful for people to question their faith at some point. Everyone has doubts and questions about their faith, but most people tend to bury or ignore them rather than to ever bring them out into the light.

I think a large portion of the apathy of modern believers is attributable to the fact that they are unwilling to ask the tough questions they have about the faith. Because of fear, they refuse to ask whether God really exists, whether Jesus was a real person, whether the Catholic Church is true and is guided into all truth.

But I ask, how can one really put faith in a God one has never had the courage to seek out? In fact perhaps the first act of faith – faith at least in truth – would be to face our fears  and seek God Himself.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines faith as “Man’s response to God”. Man responds to a God He has met, a God who has ever been waiting for Man to finally let go of His own assumptions, his own fluffy hopes, his own rendition of “I did it My Way” – to finally open up to the real God and accept no substitutes

One way or another, we have to continually break past our ideas toward the real God, and this repetition of the formation of our concept of God and the proceeding iconoclasm is a lifelong process. Why is it necessary? Because God desires nothing less than a real relationship with us.

God doesn’t want to be our Santa Claus. He doesn’t want to be up on the shelf when we need Him, and He doesn’t just want to be an idea or vague impression that we comfort ourselves with. He also doesn’t just want to be our best bet – the conclusion we cling to because more of the evidence points in His direction.

If this was the kind of relationship God wanted, if he intended us to stop at any of these points, then what are we to do with the incarnation? The “word became flesh”! The creator entered His creation, the author entered His own story, to touch us, to speak to us, to teach us to love by example.

We tend to think that a relationship in which God is present, interacting with us, speaking to us, guiding our lives, and touching our hearts is only the lot of the very great saints. But we must face the facts here: 1) We are all called to be saints and 2) Not one of us has a valid excuse as to why we aren’t.

Every one of us has been given (and squandered) enough grace to be saints – 2 Corinthians 12:19 says “my grace is sufficient”. The only thing that has stopped this has been ourselves. Plain and simple!

But He still wants us! He still waits for the day that we grow discontent with a shallow relationship with Him, discontent with only hoping He’s there, finally ready to shed the imitations and idols in exchange for the “Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the TRUTH”. We really can have it, but we have to want it and seek it.

One of the reasons people aren’t able to really pursue God as a person, as I said before, is that we are really unwilling to ask tough questions.

These are actually very basic questions about who God is, whether He is really there, whether He really loves us – pretty fundamental questions if one is to enter into relationship! Nevertheless, though we have these questions but seldom drum up the courage to ask them.

There are TWO main fears that keep people from truly seeking God. Two main fears that the devil plays upon to trap us into wishy-washy faith:

Fear that God may not be real.
Fear that God might indeed be real after all.

Let me explain.

One of the first and most obvious reasons people do not ask the questions and pursue a relationship with God is that they fear He may not be real. The fear that is the source of this doubt is the fear that keeps people from ever pursuing the answers. There is a certain solace found in uncertainty.

Most people would rather hold on to a God they are “pretty sure” is real, rather than to attempt to seek out a real one. The problem with seeking a “real” God” is that there can be only two outcomes to the search: either He is real or He isn’t! This is dangerous! Usually too dangerous for comfort.

A God about which one is “pretty sure” can never be proven false. No amount of evidence can ever take Him away and some people prefer this solace to truth. But on the other side of the coin, one cannot have a true relationship with Him either.

It is much more comfortable to have a faith that never actually has to face the question “God, are you there?” It is not that we don’t want this type of faith. We wish we could meet Him, have confidence in His presence, come into relationship with Him, and put a confident, divinely gifted faith in this relationship of love. This is a kind of faith we all desire to have, but are afraid to ask for or to seek.

We think that to so desire such a faith may be presumptuously arrogant, unattainably obscure, or ultimately undesirable in that if we actually grasped at a faith which involves the encounter with the present and true God, we might instead find him absent and false.

The second reason that people fear to seek the real God is that they are afraid He might really be there after all.

To quote CS Lewis: “An ‘impersonal God;– well and good. A subjective God of beauty, truth and goodness, inside our own heads — better still. A formless life-force surging through us, a vast power which we can tap — best of all. But God Himself, alive, pulling at the other end of the cord, perhaps, approaching an infinite speed, the hunter, king, husband — that is quite another matter. There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall? There comes a moment when people who have been dabbling in religion (“Man’s search for God!”) suddenly draw back. Supposing we really found Him? We never meant it to come to that! Worse still, supposing He had found us?”

In other words, people are afraid of a God who actually makes a difference. A God about which we are only “pretty sure is out there… somewhere… maybe…” cannot ask much of us. Our lives needn’t change for such a God and we can safely contain Him as a bullet point on our list of priorities.

But what of a God who is alive? A master? A King? This is often more than we have bargained for, and perhaps we prefer to leave well enough alone. This is why people can have such a visceral aversion to the suggestion of miracles, apparitions, prayers being answered, and the like, even by “good Christians”. It is not as much our intellects being sensible as much as it is our hearts fearing a real God who is alive and can be ignored no longer.

In conclusion, I ask you to consider these two fears that may be keeping you or someone you know from truly seeking God.

Fear that He may not be real.
Fear that He may indeed by real.

But we must seek truth, brothers and sisters, and accept nothing less. God is indeed alive and waits for us. He awaits the day that we want Him enough to not be content with anything less than He Himself.

If you ask the questions, seek the truth, accept no substitutes, you will find God.

God the creator, God the author, God the conqueror, God the King. If you so desire it, you will find Him. Nay, He will find you.

Characters

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

While there are a number of facets that make a good movie, such as its plot, setting, visuals, etc, I return always in my musings to how much of an impact good/bad characters can have.

I have seen many movies with at least decent story, great visuals, great pacing (etc, etc), but have very forgettable characters – I have come out of these experiences entertained but not moved.
On the other hand, I watch old black and white movies with decidedly poor visual quality, poor sound, again decent story, but very strong and well developed characters – in this case I am not just entertained but impressed and delighted.

The most clear example that brings out my point is “rewatchability”. Think about the movies or tv shows that you can watch over and over again.

I went through a (short) phase in my teen years where I was somewhat possessed by the idea of having an impressive movie collection. I quickly began to realize not only that A) it was expensive B) in the great scheme of things it was a terrifically worthless pursuit, but that C) most movies I would buy, I would have no interest in watching again after the first run through. At the time I was mostly into NEW, loud, graphic, sci-fi and action movies. Whatever. : )
Thinking about this “phase” later on, I wondered about the movies I had been buying – why were they so dull after the first viewing? There were other older movies/tv-shows (ones I hadn’t considered buying) that I had watched a hundred times with my parents and could easily watch another hundred times someday with my own kids! I’m talking “The Quiet Man”, “The Scarlet and the Black”, ” The Dirty Dozen”, and others.

After some years of batting these questions around about “re-watch-ability” it occurred to me that the common thread of most “re-watchable” movies is that they all seemed to rely on strong characters, whether or not they had graphics and sound to back them up.

The more I have thought about this the more I have been convinced that “characters” can be one of the strongest or weakest aspects of a movie. A strong, well-developed, unforgettable caste of characters can carry even the dullest graphics or sounds (well, to a point I suppose).

Why might this be? I postulate that this has something to do with the nature of “personhood”.

There is a definite finitude to most of the aspects of a film or show. From the props to the special effects. You see/hear the props and special effects and then …. what? That’s all there is to them. One glance, and you have for the most part exhausted what they have to offer.

Some might argue that aspects such as music and storyline might have much more to them, and I would agree. Well written music can be listened to many times and a well written story can continue to entertain and even take on new meaning upon further passes.

However, what of characters? By far, on a scale of finitude/infinitude, persons are the deepest wells.

Persons really are inexhaustible. You could spend a lifetime getting to know someone and still have barely tapped their mystery. This is easily forgotten nowadays with relationships as shallow and brittle as they are. But those who have toughed it out, stuck with a friend or spouse even through hard times and against modern sensibilities, can still tell you that people really are little points of infinity scattered about a finite world.

This of course points to forgotten common sense about people around us. How easy it is take people for granted, even though they are the real brushes with infinity that we have every day. Isn’t it crazy how easy this is to forget? We work and struggle and save and learn and rush around and busy ourselves with life… to what ends? They certainly cannot be very noble ends if we aren’t stopping to be fascinated by the people around us – to enjoy them and to love them and to recall, again, how much more important and infinite people really are than anything else in our lives!

With this peculiar inexhaustibility of human persons in mind, perhaps we have our answer to why certain movies or tv-shows are “re-watchable”. A movie that is full of graphics and sound but with shallow, underdeveloped, unrealistic characters, is easily exhausted! Once we’ve seen it or heard it, we’ve pretty much seen and heard it all.

But what of movie that have strong characters, almost regardless of the graphics and sound? Will you ever be able to watch “The Quiet Man” enough times to exhaust Sean Thornton (or his actor, John Wayne?). Or Rhett Butler and Scarlet O’Hara in “Gone With the Wind”? How much more memorable was the old Star Wars trilogy compared to the new, even though the new had twice the graphics/sound/explosions/lasers/and the like? Could it have been the unforgettable cast of the original trilogy and the (on the whole) forgettable cast of the new? Lord of the Rings, Bella, It’s a Wonderful Life, etc etc etc.

Instead of boring you with my list of movie and tv favorites, I’ll leave you to come up with your own (and share if you’d like!). But as you do so, think about the ones that are rewatchable and let me know if you agree with my proposition. I think you’ll begin to notice a pattern between the very great rewatchable classics and that tv show that grips you every time ( I am a “Law and Order” junkie). The characters are striking, rich, and as in real life, infinite and inexhaustible.

From one infinite soul to another, be blessed.

JonMarc Grodi